Site map

Home

About us

Leadership Roundtable

Community Conversations

Initiatives

Publications

Resources

News and Media

Links

Search

 

 

There are many ways to shop for your needs...

 But only one adds social value to 

   Waterloo Region. Through the Social Purchasing Portal it's simple, straight forward and socially responsible.

(Follow the link to learn more about this exciting initiative!)

 

Download or Print new flyer!

 

Our Funders and Sponsors:

Region of Waterloo     The Ontario Trillium Foundation      Vibrant Communities      Lyle S. Hallman Foundation       CIBC     Kitchener and Waterloo Community Foundation

View more...

 

 

Community Conversations Q & A Board

(Click here to read instructions)

 

 

Contact us to purchase our publication:

 

 

or a Community Conversations video

 

(click here to read a segment of Opportunities 2000)

 

 

 

E-mail us to

Sign up for our Newsletter

 

 

 

Search Conference


What would Waterloo Region look like if there were no one living in poverty? What are the obstacles to achieving this desirable future and what steps need to be taken to make this vision a reality?

 
On January 14 and 15, 1999, more than forty people representing a broad cross-section of the local community assembled in the Kitchener Public Library to tackle these challenging questions. They were brought together by Opportunities 2000 to help chart a course for the elimination of poverty in Waterloo Region.

 
The two-day event employed an innovative planning process known as the "search conference." Used successfully in many different settings over the past thirty years, the search conference format enables diverse participants to recognize their common stake in a complex issue. Participants begin by exploring the broad, long term factors shaping their situation and gradually identify specific ways they can work together to create the future they desire.

 
Undaunted by the stormy weather wreaking havoc throughout southern Ontario, representatives from all sectors of Waterloo Region-corporate, government, community and people in poverty-dedicated themselves to two intense days of discussion. The following report reflects the wealth of ideas and insights generated by participants as they responded to the challenge of eliminating poverty in their community.





Summary Highlights of OP2000 Search Conference
Kitchener, Ontario, January 14 - 15, 1999



BACKGROUND

  • The Search Conference is a way to solicit input on complex issues and to find common ground in order to create a plan for the most desirable future of a community.

  • Opportunities 2000 sponsored this conference, with over 40 people attending from various sectors: government, corporate, community and people in poverty. The OP2000 Learning Consortium and the Caledon Institute of Social Policy were also represented.

  • Mr. Larry Gravill, Chief of Police for Waterloo Region and the Honourable Elizabeth Witmer, MPP and Ontario Minister of Health, spoke during lunch breaks at this two- day event.

CONFERENCE GOAL

  • The conference goal was to bring together all sectors in order to identify issues and solutions to poverty. In preparation for the conference, participants were asked to reflect on the following questions:
    • What do we need to do to eliminate poverty in Waterloo Region?
    • What needs to be done to untie the knots and build better systems?

FINDINGS

The conference assisted OP2000 in articulating answers to seven questions:

I. What are the trends globally and locally which are influencing poverty?

II. If trends continue, or new changes occur that break with past trends, what is the future of poverty if we do nothing?

III. What things have been done well? What areas could be improved?

IV. What could the future look like?

V. What obstacles stand in our way of reaching this desirable future?

VI. What action plans can we put into place?

VII. What should be the priority of OP2000? What is your commitment, personally, to reducing poverty in Waterloo Region?



I. What are the trends globally and locally which are influencing poverty?

More than 50 trends were identified. Both global and Waterloo Region trends focussed on three areas: economic (e.g., globalization and job shifts); social/demographic (e.g., marginalization and a feeling of hopelessness); and political (e.g., reduction in social programs and the safety net).

The following major observations were noted by conference participants:

  • Globalization of the economy has weakened the power of the nation-state; community bonds (ethnic, social, geographic) are becoming more important as people seek new sources of support in a turbulent environment.
  • Technological change is creating challenges; opportunity for some, struggle for others (less educated, older workers, those who can’t afford new technologies).
  • There is a growing number of ‘bad jobs’ (low wage, insecure, part-time, short-term).
  • The gap between rich and poor is widening at all levels (local, national, global).
  • There is a growing emphasis on combating poverty by enabling people to secure employment rather than by providing people with income assistance.
  • There is a growing emphasis on personal and community responsibility - active citizenship.
  • Young people are facing greater challenges: student loans are crippling; it’s harder to secure first-time jobs.
  • Family breakdown is on the rise; there are more single parents.
  • The aging of the population is creating new challenges.
  • Economic and political stress in many parts of the world are increasing the numbers of political refugees and economic immigrants.
  • A growing number of people are feeling hopeless in the face of an increasingly steep uphill battle.
  • Large-scale withdrawal of resources has dramatically weakened the social safety net.
  • Federal and provincial governments are downloading responsibilities to the local level.
  • Re-organizing of social programs is creating uncertainty and anxiety.
  • Local communities (city-states) are becoming increasingly important sites for social action.
  • Diverse local stakeholders are being mobilized and are seeking new relationships with one another.

II. If trends continue, or new changes occur that break with past trends, what is the future of poverty if we do nothing?

This question generated 84 comments. 30 percent of the comments related to increased pressure on the social safety net/marginalization (n=25). An increase in poverty and a widening of the poverty gap (n=17), along with a wide range of feelings such as hopelessness and frustration (n=16), accounted for 40 percent of the responses. Other categories identified include: crime/violence (n=9), chances for solving the problem (n=6), family pressures (n=5), economic challenges (n=4) and other (n=2).

Key themes emerging from the discussion included:

  • There will be a greater demand for social supports but fewer services.
  • Private charities and non-profits will struggle to respond; volunteers/workers will burn out.
  • More resources will go to crisis intervention and less to long term preventive measures.
  • Pressure will mount to create a two-tier society (split in access to health, housing, education).
  • A growing number of people will experience deeper and more persistent poverty.
  • More people will be 'working poor’.
  • Many people will experience frustration, anxiety, stress; social tensions will become more pronounced; possibility of social discord will rise.
  • Crime and violence will increase.
  • There will be increased immigration to the Region and growing hostility and racism expressed toward newcomers as people struggle with one another to meet basic needs.
  • Young people will become demoralized; the next two generations will be in jeopardy.
  • Mental and physical health of many will deteroriate.
  • Businesses will resort increasingly to importing skilled labour from outside the region or the country due to lack of investment in the local labour force.
  • Productivity will decrease; the local economy will create less opportunity; brain drain to the U.S. will accelerate.

III. What things have been done well? What areas could be improved?

These two questions were especially significant for the conference participants because it was a time when everyone was reminded of the many things that we have done well in Waterloo Region. Participants identified 105 things that we have done well, including:

Community caring (n=55)

  • e.g., over 1,100 nonprofit organizations and strong corporate citizenship, accessibility for people with physical disabilities, broad-based support for United Way, strong tradition of social action among faith communities.
Leadership and innovation (n=22)
  • e.g., first poor house in Canada established in the 1800’s, first social resources council, recent announcement of one million dollars in grant money from Human Resources Development Canada, ‘Barter Works’ , Region of Waterloo’s restoration of discretionary benefits lost by social assistance recipients.
Social safety net/infrastructure (n=14)
  • e.g., good youth programs and strong neighborhood associations.
Economic issues (n=11)
  • e.g., third lowest poverty rate in Canada - strong economic growth in region.
Local culture/quality of life (n=3)
  • e.g., rich cultural base and ethnic diversity.

Participants identified 35 items upon which we can improve. These included the social safety net (n=12), economic issues (n=8), marginalization (n=7), health (n=5) and attitudes/complacency (n=3). Specific examples include:

  • Lack of affordable housing.
  • Duplication of services.
  • Lack of broad corporate sector involvement in poverty concerns.
  • Difficulty finding jobs for people without specialized training.
  • Limited access to mental health services.
  • Service ‘silos’ - lack of coordination and integration of various public services.
  • New Canadians don’t always feel welcome.

IV. What could the future look like?

During this phase of the conference, participants used skits as a way to express their vision of a desirable future for the Waterloo Region. In general, participants imagined a Region where few if any people experienced social and economic distress. Agencies that currently address the most dire of needs (such as food banks) were seen as no longer necessary. The economic and social structures of the future enabled people to meet their basic needs on a consistent basis and to become creative participants in shaping their own lives. There was a high level of cooperation among all facets of the local community and strong interpersonal relations. All members of the community contributed to and shared in a dynamic social, economic and political life. Accomplishing this attractive future meant achieving changes in diverse aspects of life in the Region, including:

  • Housing
  • Employment
  • Community/learning/employment
  • Transportation
  • Taxation
  • Health and social services
  • Local government structure
  • Recreation
  • Values
  • Food security
  • Police
  • Community development


V. What obstacles stand in our way of reaching this desirable future?
VI. What action plans can we put into place?


The following table outlines some of the identified obstacles along with possible actions to reduce or eliminate these obstacles.

OBSTACLES
ACTIONS
Values
  • negative attitudes about poverty
  • fragmentation and diversification of services that affect the family unit
  • lack of value for food production
  • work towards building a ‘Caring Society’
  • undertake public awareness campaign/support community engagement and mobilization
  • need mechanism to allow children to volunteer/foster good citizenship
  • more inter-generational programs, e.g., adopt-a-grandma
  • develop links with isolated youth and seniors
  • more progressive system recognizing stay-at-home parents
  • educational program to value the prevention of poverty
  • need expectation to invest in the community’s financial and human resources
  • more emphasis on bartering and local production of food
Community
  • inadequate, inappropriate or uncoordinated resources and/or staffing to help strengthen communities
  • government and community boundaries don’t necessarily correspond
  • no-fee cards - access for low income people during off-peak hours to all services
  • need to develop a community leadership model using existing resources, e.g., school council (institutional memory)
Housing
  • unavailability of affordable, adequate housing
  • five housing authorities, unsure of waiting list size
  • federal/provincial resolution required for operating transfer - municipalities need time to learn about existing stock and current situation
  • increase availability of affordable housing
  • more active municipal regulatory role: owner-occupied duplexes only
  • make mortgage interest deductible on homes - more affordable
  • no GST on first new homes (progressive)
  • remove provincial land transfer tax on first homes (progressive)
  • incentives for housing developments
  • explore ownership alternatives/develop Habitat-like experiences
  • advocacy at local, provincial and federal level
  • transfer operating and administrative responsibility to go with financial responsibility - clarify regional responsibilities and capacity issues
  • subsidize units in private apartment buildings - need to find a source of funding
Employment
  • ‘non-living’ wage
  • changing technologies create ‘multi-career lives’
  • skills that people have don’t match employment skills needed
  • over-employment
  • family friendly policy, job sharing
  • challenge corporate sector to create profits in employees, environmental stewardship, ‘social capital’
  • corporate pilot projects to demonstrate leadership
  • internal training for jobs/retrain unemployed with appropriate skills
  • encourage training for specific jobs
  • demand basic income, basic benefits
  • promotion of entrepreneurship
  • work with youth
Community learning environment
  • structural obstacles: two education systems, provincial control of education system, hard to fill high level technical skills and apprenticeships
  • integrate all education and training programs
  • identify job needs (by employers) compared to education
  • design programming to prepare people for non-university, but skilled jobs
  • ensure wages are adequate to move out of poverty, not just have jobs (more than 50 percent of families in poverty are working)
  • look at loan-financing issues
  • link with transportation and child care issues
Transportation
  • population density low
  • difficult to get around region - cities divided
  • jobs and residences not in same place
  • establish heavily subsidized regional system or light rail system
  • explore options for connecting systems in the short-term; revamp along regional lines in the long term
  • subsidized bus passes
  • go to councils and push for integrated system
  • talk to people and media regarding transportation issues
Ensure basic needs met/social services
  • funding
  • lack of basic income
  • poverty trap - rules that create disincentives
  • collapse funding envelopes
  • move towards accessible community-based holistic care centres
  • redefine benefit eligibility in living arrangements; allow non- traditional units.
  • create ways to get seed money
  • incentives for private affordable housing
  • explore ‘co-housing’ as an alternative; shared housing
  • look at changes to the tax system


VII. What should be the priority of OP2000? What is your commitment, personally, to reducing poverty in Waterloo Region?

The conference participants identified a number of priorities for OP2000 including:

  1. Influence policy - need a policy agenda to impact the changes in government roles, not just locally but also provincially and federally.
  2. Build a framework - develop a comprehensive action plan and then act!
  3. Initiate a public education and awareness campaign.
  4. Continue to establish partnerships within the community, including the corporate sector.
  5. Lobby for improved transportation systems throughout the region, including free or subsidized access for people in need.
  6. Continue efforts to reduce poverty. Dealing with poverty is an investment in our future. Remember employment does not necessarily reduce poverty.
Participants were asked to state their personal commitment to reducing poverty. There were a large variety of responses, including corporate commitments to review salary ranges in their organizations to ensure employees are above the poverty level and personal commitments to address the issue of affordable housing. Some participants also pledged to help build a viable society for all by leading simple lives themselves.



OP2000 Search Conference Participants


Community Agencies

Achievement In Motion
Cambridge Self-Help Food Bank
Cambridge Youth Services
CIRCA Development Services
Community Justice Initiatives
Focus for Ethnic Women
House of Friendship
KW Multicultural Centre



LIFE*SPIN
Lutherwood CODA
Ray of Hope
Smithson School Council
Social Planning Council of KW
Working for Work
Youth Links to Literacy
YWCA of Cambridge

Government

City of Kitchener, 2 Councillors
City of Waterloo, Councillor
City of Waterloo, Mayor
Commissioner & Medical Officer of Health



District Health Council
Human Resources Development Canada
Region of Waterloo, Regional Chair

Business/Corporate

Conestoga Rovers & Associates
First Echo Group, Inc.
KPMG
Royal Bank of Canada
Pat Henderson & Associates
S-S Technologies

Other

Caledon Institute of Social Policy
OP2000 Leadership Roundtable
OP2000 Staff



People living in poverty
The KW Record (newspaper)
University of Waterloo

Speakers

Doug Bowie, Facilitator, University of Calgary
Honourable Elizabeth Witmer, MPP and Minister of Health
Larry Gravill, Chief of Police, Waterloo Region
Manager, As You Like it Café (Catering)
Owners, Game-stirs (Catering)


NOTE: This document is a summary of the conference.

Back to Publications

Back to Home

 

Opportunities Waterloo Region

235 King Street East,

    Kitchener, ON N2G 4N5

    Tel: (519) 883-2353

    Fax: (519) 568-8587

Send us an e-mail with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 2008 09 02